Nearly 80 years ago, Bernard DeVoto, the Utah-born writer and historian, wrote an essay titled “The West Against Itself” for Harper’s Magazine.
DeVoto summed up the platform pressed by Western elected officials of his day in a memorable punchline: “Get out—and give us more money.” This “economic fantasy” is still with us, as DeVoto predicted, “yesterday, today, and forever.”
The new, fossil-fuel-friendly heads of federal land management agencies are serious about the “get out” part of that plea, firing thousands of their employees and closing dozens of offices across the West. Their list targets Fort Collins, Colorado; Flagstaff, Arizona; Moab and Salt Lake City, Utah; Lander, Wyoming; Boise, Idaho, and more. Local economies will lose millions they’ve depended on.
But Donald Trump and Elon Musk aren’t doing so well with the “give us more money” part. Voters who elected Trump may not get what they bargained for.
I have a home in southern Utah, in Torrey, gateway to Capitol Reef National Park. My neighbors in Wayne and Garfield counties, who gave well over 70 percent of their votes to Trump, often complain about federal overreach. They see conservation of national public lands as “locking up” land.
Yet Westerners love all that financial support coming in from the agencies they profess to hate. They rely on the federal government for so much more than they often acknowledge.
After a charming presentation about cowboy culture at Torrey’s nonprofit Entrada Institute recently, my wife asked a young rancher what his family did for health insurance.
“My wife works for the Forest Service,” he said. Indeed, government employees make up 23 percent of the workforce in Utah’s Garfield County and 25 percent in Wayne County. These salaries and the benefits that come with them are crucial to family stability.
A revealing interactive map in Grist magazine shows the reach of investment by the federal government through legislation passed by the Biden administration. I click on the town of Torrey and find tens of millions of federal dollars from the Inflation Reduction Act and bipartisan infrastructure law flowing into the county.
Think upgrades of rural airports, solar panels on small businesses, bridge replacements, removal of lead from drinking water—and on and on.
And then on February 14, the Department of the Interior announced the firings of more than 2,300 public servants at the Department of the Interior, including the Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, and Geological Survey. With this “Valentine’s Day Massacre,” southern Utah communities will feel accelerating impacts — loss of income and benefits, more money going to unemployment payments, understaffed parks and monuments, irate visitors.
My inbox and social media feed are flooded with anecdotes about what these firings mean. One man grew up in a Park Service family and then worked as a park ranger himself for years. He transferred to the Forest Service recently, becoming a “probationary” employee only because he was new to his position. He lost his job and his career thanks to the Trump administration.
When rural Westerners say “get out” to the feds, I don’t think this is what they have in mind.
President Trump is also considering once more eviscerating national monument protection for Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears in southern Utah. These monuments have been good for local communities and economies.
The monuments haven’t locked up the land; ranchers still have their grazing permits. Pre-existing mining and drilling claims remain in force. And the conservation and tourism values of these designated preserves expand every year.
According to a recent Colorado College poll, 84 percent of Utahns support establishment of new national parks, national monuments, national wildlife refuges and tribal protected areas. Still, Utah’s governor, attorney general, and congressional delegation continue to waste millions on fruitless lawsuits attacking those same preserves.
Westerners are evolving; politicians aren’t keeping up. And yet we keep re-electing these same officials. Maybe, just maybe, the Trumpian war on civil servants will force a reckoning. We’ll re-evaluate why we need a robust federal presence in the West.
And our war against ourselves will end.
Stephen Trimble is a contributor to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. He worked for the National Park Service, BLM, and Forest Service in his twenties and has been a conservation advocate ever since.
This column was published in the following newspapers:
03/18/2025 | Salt Lake Tribune | Salt Lake City | UT |
03/17/2025 | Vail Daily | Vail | CO |
03/19/2025 | The Landdesk | Durango | co |
03/19/2025 | Montrose Daily Press | Montrose | CO |
03/20/2025 | Coyote Gulch | Denver | CO |
03/20/2025 | Moab Times Independent | Moab | UT |
03/22/2025 | Las Vegas Sun | Las Vegas | NV |
03/21/2025 | Seaside Signal | Astoria | OR |
03/20/2025 | Laramie Boomerang | Laramie | WY |
03/20/2025 | Delta County Independent | Delta | CO |
03/20/2025 | Taos News | Taos | NM |
03/21/2025 | Center Post Dispatch | Center | CO |
As usual, you’ve hit the nail right on the head. When will people wake up? probably when they’re directly getting hurt
I actually want that hurt to come faster rather than slower, Harvey. The alarm is screaming at us!
[…] the link to read the article on the Writers on the Range website (Stephen […]
Great, succinct article, Stephen! Makes me think of so many western ranchers who becry government overreach while taking full part in welfare handouts of public lands to graze on.
I once talked to a “rancher” near Escalante. He had 12 or 13 kids and was bemoaning all the government restrictions that were making it hard to make a living ranching. I forget he number but he said the previous year he’d only made $XX dollars ranching–it was a single digit number in the low thousands. He said “If I couldn’t supplement my ranch income with my teaching job my family would be in trouble.” I said “So you’re a school teacher?” He said “No, I’m a rancher!” The teaching job provided steady income and health insurance for his large family. Ranching was a lifestyle and a hobby at that point. Without the hated government, he’d be flailing and always would be. But he was a “rancher” dammit!