Montana’s politicians have lost their ties to land

By John Clayton

Tim Sheehy, the Republican seeking to unseat Montana Democratic Senator Jon Tester, is a business executive born and raised out of state. That same description applies to Troy Downing, a Republican running for one of Montana’s two Congressional seats. Same for Montana’s Republican Governor Greg Gianforte and his challenger, Democrat Ryan Busse­.

I have nothing against out-of-staters moving to Montana or working at a business. I fit both categories myself years ago. But I think this change in politicians’ backgrounds reflects a change in how Montanans view their identity.

Previous Montana politicians who weren’t government lawyers often came from farming and ranching or related businesses. Today’s business backgrounds are less intimate with Montana’s land. Gianforte started a software company. Sheehy founded imaging technology and aerial firefighting businesses. Downing, a real estate developer, has owned everything from self-storage units to vineyards.

Seeking business-friendly policies, Republicans have long favored candidates with business backgrounds. But today’s desire for political outsiders includes Democrats like Busse, a former firearms executive without experience in elected office. And recent high-profile Democratic candidates have included educators, managers, and a musician—in other words, people who have not worked daily with nature and its resources.

Montanans used to mistrust government officials who lacked intimacy with the land. But today, both parties elevate politicians who lack that intimacy, probably because Montanans care more about ideological issues such as immigration, abortion, inflation or gender identity.

Political power used to flow from grazing stock and vast acreages. Now it flows from Wall Street stock and scenic mansions. For example, Sheehy and Downing own homes in the chichi resort of Big Sky; Gianforte comes from the expensive Bozeman area; Busse comes from the scenic and pricey Flathead region.

Sure, those places are Montana. But Montana’s politicians once came from less-glamorous places, including bare-knuckle Butte, the faded mining metropolis; remote Libby, with its logging and mining economy; and dusty Billings, an oil and cow town. In the 2000 and 2004 gubernatorial elections, Democrat Brian Schweitzer owned a Flathead mint farm but bragged that he was raised on an eastern Montana cattle ranch.

In other words, politicians once claimed Montanan identity through shared experience. That often included in-state birth and always included land-based pastimes like hunting. Today it’s less “Are you a hunter?” than “Are you endorsed by the National Rifle Association?”

The shift makes it hard to interpret politicians’ actions. For example, in 2021, Governor Gianforte a killed a mountain lion and trapped and killed a wolf. Because he’s not a rancher-politician, we can’t understand, much less endorse, such acts in the context of a lifelong working relationship with land and livestock.

Similarly, Gianforte, Busse, and Downing have all been cited for various gradations of hunting violations. Should we judge them differently than we would a native-born hunter? And Sheehy’s company is deeply in debt. For a ranch, that wouldn’t be surprising. But for an aerospace company?

To the rest of the country, choosing leaders based on ideologies may sound familiar. But Montana, aka “Big Sky Country,” used to pride itself on being different. More place-based, more rural, more centered on the individual.

Outsiders may have dismissed such philosophies as insular and backward—but that dismissal was what made them outsiders.

How should we react to this change? We might celebrate that Montana is leaving behind its tired frontier myths. Or we might mourn the shift, because Montana’s extraordinary landscapes—and people’s deep relationships to them—were what once made the state special. As Montana changes from bovines to business and from rural to resort, its politics can feel like yet another big-box store featuring all the latest national trends.

Then there’s Senator Jon Tester, the lone elected Democrat who’s running for re-election. The third-generation farmer from the wide-open plains of Big Sandy represents the land-based tradition that Montanans once cherished. But do Montana voters still want a senator like that?

Regardless of outcomes this November, the act of choosing by ideology rather than deep roots in the land marks a huge change.

John Clayton is a contributor to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. The author of books including Stories from Montana’s Enduring Frontier, his newsletter is naturalstories.substack.com.

Montana, plains Lee Peters image, via Unsplash

This column was published in the following newspapers:

08/12/2024 Vail Daily Vail CO
08/13/2024 Montrose Daily Press Montrose CO
08/13/2024 Denver Post Denver CO
08/13/2024 Explore Big Sky Big Sky MT
08/14/2024 Moab Times Independent Moab UT
08/14/2024 Steamboat Pilot Steamboat Springs CO
08/15/2024 Taos News Taos NM
08/15/2024 Aspen Daily News Aspen CO
08/14/2024 Whitehall Ledger Whitehall MT
08/15/2024 Durango Telegraph Durango CO
08/17/2024 Hungry Horse News Columbia Falls MT
08/17/2024 Mineral County Miner Monte Vista CO
08/15/2024 Center Post Dispatch Center CO
08/17/2024 Conejos County Citizen Monte Vista CO
08/18/2024 Missoulian Missoula Montana
08/18/2024 Ravalli Republic Hamilton MT
08/19/2024 The Daily Yonder Whitesburg Ky
08/18/2024 Billings Gazette Billings MT
08/16/2024 Laramie Boomerang Laramie WY
08/20/2024 Montana Standard Butte MT
08/16/2024 Rock Springs Rocket Miner Rock Springs WY
08/16/2024 Monte Vista Journal Monte Vista CO
08/16/2024 South Fork Tines South Fork CO
08/21/2024 Helena Independent Record Helena MT
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave
1 month ago

It’s sad how the Republican Party, the party of the rich, has captured the support of working class folks. They’ve done it through domination of the media in rural areas. In the early 2000’s, I had a job that took me on the road in rural Colorado (where I live), and all I could get was AM radio,which was a dominated by the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity, who spewed hatred and discontent like a firehose. Having a small business which dealt with local vendors, I noticed that, among the counter folks, it was “cool” to support the most radical conservatives … and that remains the case til today. This is hard to understand, because Democrats kick started rural electrification, Social Security, Medicare, provided jobs during the Great Depression, and supported labor laws while Republicans gave tax breaks to the rich (trump paid only $760/yr during two years while he was president). We need better messaging in rural areas, or we’ll lose our democracy.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Once a week you’ll receive an email with a link to our weekly column along with profiles of our writers, beside quirky photos submitted from folks like you. Don’t worry we won’t sell our list or bombard you with daily mail.

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x