Wyoming shoots itself in the foot

By Jonathan Thompson

This summer, the Biden administration offered Wyoming $35 million to help the state plug and clean up abandoned oil and gas wells. When Wyoming turned down the cash, it seemed hard to believe.

It could cost the state more than twice that amount to reclaim its 1,000 or so defunct wells that remain unplugged. Economists have also warned that market forces will continue to diminish the state’s main revenue source—severance taxes on fossil fuels.

That’s not all. Last year, Wyoming turned down federal money for electric vehicle charging stations. Then, when Governor Mark Gordon refused to take part in the EPA’s pollution reduction program, the state lost tens of millions of dollars in federal funding.

Meanwhile, the state is spending millions of taxpayers’ dollars on lawsuits seeking to eviscerate Biden administration rules aimed at protecting the environment and human health and mitigating harmful effects of climate change.

It’s all part of a disturbing shift among Western Republicans and the states they dominate. They are veering away from the more pragmatic conservatism of Teddy Roosevelt or even Ronald Reagan, and into the hard right, anti-government quagmire.

Governor Gordon has been swept up in this shift. Gordon was born in New York City and grew up on the family ranch in Kaycee, Wyoming. He registered as a Republican at age 18, attended Vermont’s Middlebury College, then came back to Wyoming to continue ranching. At the same time, he pushed back on the coalbed-methane drilling boom that was ravaging his state, a fact missing from his official biographies.

Gordon’s activism included serving on environmental groups’ boards and he went on record attacking the energy industry for turning Buffalo into “the place that stinks on the way to Casper.” Nevertheless, he later worked for an oil company as its conservation director.

He still straddled the fence politically, donating to both Republican and Democratic candidates and committees on a state and national level during the 1990s and early 2000s. But he was not an anomaly; this sort of ideological flexibility was once common in Western states.

When Gordon ran for Congress as a moderate in 2008, he said both the Republican Party and the Sierra Club had “gotten off track,” with the GOP moving too far to the right and abandoning Roosevelt-style conservationism. He said environmentalists also became less willing to compromise, particularly on public-land grazing issues.

Gordon ended up losing the primary to hardliner Cynthia Lummis—now a U.S. senator—after she attacked Gordon for his environmental ties and bipartisan tendencies. But Gordon stuck to his relatively moderate stance when he ran for governor in 2018 and defeated hardliner Harriet Hageman—who would later unseat Liz Cheney.

As governor, Gordon has acknowledged human-caused climate change and supported clean-energy development, while also looking to keep the fossil fuel industry afloat by pushing carbon capture rather than closing coal plants or regulating drilling.

He was forceful and eloquent in condemning the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, tweeting: “Interfering with the peaceful transfer of power is an affront to the very Constitution that has made our country what it is. I believe America will not—cannot—stand for this assault on our democracy.”

This centrism has played well with voters. Gordon easily won a second term in 2022. But the radical right-wing, climate-denying branch of Wyoming’s legislature, the Freedom Caucus, has relentlessly blasted him for it.

In purple states, such as Arizona, the radicalization of the GOP has been met with backlash from moderates, who can seek refuge in a growing Democratic Party. But in Wyoming, newcomers fleeing more liberal states are turning the legislature a deeper shade of red, lending power and members to the Freedom Caucus.

The Wyoming governor has struggled to hold his ground. His rhetoric on Biden’s purported “war on fossil fuels”—and the state’s legal challenges to common-sense environmental protections—have grown more strident, even though Gordon knows full well that market forces, not regulations, are behind the industries’ decline.

The intent here is not to heap criticism on Gordon; he gets enough of that from his party members. Rather it is to lament the imminent extinction of the moderate, conservation-leaning, pragmatic Western Republican.

Think of all those missed opportunities. In today’s political climate, Gordon either must adapt or be thrown out of office, and that’s not good for Wyoming or the West.

Jonathon Thompson is a contributor to writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. He is the editor of The Land Desk and a longtime Western author and writer.

This column was published in the following newspapers:

10/14/2024 Vail Daily Vail CO
10/15/2024 Denver Post Denver CO
10/15/2024 Tucson Star Tucson AZ
10/16/2024 Steamboat Pilot Steamboat Springs CO
10/16/2024 Montrose Daily Press Montrose CO
10/16/2024 Alamosa Valley Courier Alamosa CO
10/16/2024 Del Norte Prospector Del Norte CO
10/17/2024 Wyofile WY
10/17/2024 Monte Vista Journal Monte Vista CO
10/16/2024 The Landdesk Durango co
10/18/2024 Laramie Boomerang Laramie WY
10/18/2024 Center Post Dispatch Center CO
10/19/2024 Wyoming Tribune Eagle Cheyenne WY
10/17/2024 Taos News Taos NM
10/19/2024 Durango Herald Durango CO
10/20/2024 Coyote Gulch Denver CO
10/19/2024 Pagosa Springs Sun Pagosa Springs CO
10/23/2024 Uintah Basin Standard Roosevelt UT
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric S.
5 months ago

Was that after they had run over their foot with a snowmobile? Whether it is allowing wildlife “whacking” to continue unabated (and no, dispatching of the predator in a timely manner won’t happen because it is impossible to enforce it); or, spending gobs of taxpayers money to litigate the BLM Powder River Basin coal leasing ban; or, cutting back on oversight and regulation of hard rock mining despite vociferous public opposition; or, fighting the BLM conservation-focused Red Rock RMP, it’s a surprise Wyoming has much of a foot left after the number of times it keeps shooting itself there. Not to mention that it will soon allow the public the right to conceal-carry weapons into the Capitol building. Whatcha bet that it’ll be more than their foot that gets shot? What a wacky, Wild West state!

Pete Rozowski
5 months ago

The author does not well articulate what “Wyoming” is doing wrong and instead spends most of the article providing his opinion on Gov. Gordon’s background and positions. Other articles on the subject point out that the federal program requires shutting in of operating wells, so called stripper wells that no longer produce a lot of oil but in total provide about 15% of Wyoming’s oil. The acceptance of the funding also requires monitoring of methane releases before and after plugging, and pays nothing for the monitoring. For such small wells this may be an undue burden. I have personally met the governor, been in his office, which I cannot say is possible in most states including Colorado. He is an approachable person that listens to his advisors and constituents. Wyoming is a very small state with very passionate people regarding their role in US Energy history and policy. The author may want to spend some time there before judging.

Will
5 months ago
Reply to  Pete Rozowski

Pete, could you please read the column before commenting? The $35 million was for the “state to plug and clean up abandoned oil and gas wells.” There is no mention of shutting in producing wells.

Peter Rozowski
5 months ago
Reply to  Will

Will, the article is incorrect. I read it completely. I then did some independent research. In order to plug the wells they have to be wells that are producing.

Peter Rozowski
5 months ago
Reply to  Will

In case you too would like to research what the author should have. https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=350045

Will
5 months ago
Reply to  Peter Rozowski

Companies don’t ever say, “I’m done here.” They sell them to ever more marginal players until the least-capitalized players abandon the wells and list them as “still producing” otherwise, they are obligated to plug and remediate. It’s their obligation under the law. Give up your silly argument that Democrats are forcing oil production to halt. It’s a false narrative. And no, we can’t control the weather.

Pete Rozowski
5 months ago
Reply to  Will

You seem to be assuming a lot about people without really discussing the facts. The fact of the funding was that additional monitoring, that was
is not funded, is required and that it was targeting stripper wells. Wyoming actually requires a well remediation bond. I made no comment about political affiliation but somehow you get to false narratives and even conspiracy theories!?!? People need to start thinking for themselves and not what their parties and media affiliation tell them to.

#Wyoming shoots itself in the foot: Veering away from the more pragmatic conservatism of Teddy Roosevelt or even Ronald Reagan, and into the hard right, anti-government quagmire — Jonathan P. Thompson (WritersOnTheRange.org) – Coyote Gulch
5 months ago

[…] the link to read the article on the Writers on the Range website (Jonathan P. […]

James T Lynch
2 months ago

Another travesty from the anti-science reactionary’s convoluted non-think. They are pathetically tied to the drivel that goes around up there as patriotism. In their case truly a bastion of psycho’s just like their “Dear Leader”.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Once a week you’ll receive an email with a link to our weekly column along with profiles of our writers, beside quirky photos submitted from folks like you. Don’t worry we won’t sell our list or bombard you with daily mail.

9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x