It’s time to stop shipping water across the Rockies

By David O. Williams

It was 1952 when the cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs first started gobbling up water rights in a remote, high mountain valley on the state’s Western Slope. The valley is called Homestake, and now, those same cities want even more of its pure water.

In western Colorado, where only about 20% of Colorado’s population lives, all water tries to flow toward the Pacific Ocean. On the east side, where most people live, water flows to the Atlantic. To bring the water from the west side to the east side of the Rockies requires lots of money and lots of pipelines.

But money isn’t much of a barrier when your population is exploding:  Colorado Springs, with 478,961 residents, and Aurora, with 386,261, need more water. And they aim to get it even if it must cross under the Continental Divide and damage a fragile and ancient wetland called a “fen” in the process.

The new reservoir the two cities plan to build would be five miles downstream from their existing Homestake Reservoir, and called Whitney Reservoir after a creek that flows into Homestake Creek. There’s also a Whitney Park within the nearby Holy Cross Wilderness Area, which could lose some 500 acres if the new reservoir goes through.

But protesters are already active, and conservation groups are threatening lawsuits. Meanwhile, the cities have already quietly begun test drilling at four possible dam sites on U.S. Forest Service land along Homestake Creek.

Obstacles, however, are popping up. The Forest Service says it won’t even consider a reservoir proposal that shrinks a wilderness area, and the cities would have to get that approval from both Congress and the White House.

The U.S. congressman for the district, rising Democratic star Joe Neguse, has also made it clear he doesn’t support shrinking a designated wilderness or damaging wetlands. Local leaders are also chiming in: “A Whitney Reservoir would irreparably change and harm our community,” said Minturn Mayor John Widerman and Red Cliff Mayor Duke Gerber, who co-wrote a letter to the Forest Service.  Both represent small towns dependent on tourism and outdoor recreation.

State Sen. Kerry Donovan, a Democrat who grew up in the nearby ski town of Vail, also wrote the Forest Service to oppose the dam: “I cannot express how sternly the citizens of my district … oppose water diversion projects to Front Range communities.”

Another issue, and for some it’s the most critical, is the fate of valuable “fen” wetlands that would be destroyed by a dam and reservoir. “This is one of the finest wetlands we can find on our forest — it’s unbelievable,” White River National Forest Supervisor Scott Fitzwilliams told Aspen Journalism in 2019. “You can mitigate, but you can’t replace 10,000 years of work.”

Nor can you turn the clock back to 1952, when Colorado’s population was 1.36 million, compared to 5.7 million today, and the global land and ocean temperature was 1.52 degrees Fahrenheit cooler. Climate change, scientists say, will cause the Colorado River to lose up to 31% of its historical flow by 2052. That prediction was a factor in a recent, first-ever federal water shortage declaration.

“When Colorado Springs and Aurora got their water right, the [Holy Cross] wilderness wasn’t there and wetlands at that time were something we were just filling in,” said Jerry Mallett, president of the local conservation group Colorado Headwaters. “Since then (wetlands) have become an extremely valuable resource because of what they can do for groundwater recharge, addressing climate change — all kinds of things.”

Then there’s the issue of Kentucky bluegrass, Colorado’s landscaping groundcover of choice. Kentucky gets more than 50 inches of rain a year compared to the Front Range average of 17, so why pump western Colorado’s high-elevation water through the Rockies for lawns?

Colorado photographer and conservationist John Fielder, who says he’s been just about everywhere within the nearly 123,000-acre Holy Cross Wilderness Area, wants people to just look at his images of the fen wetlands along Homestake Creek, and then ask themselves these questions:

“Is anything more sublime and fertile and life-giving than a 10,000-or-more-year-old fen wetland? You can’t “mitigate” the loss of ancient wetlands by creating a manmade wet place somewhere else. No more water to the Front Range.” David O. Williams is a contributor to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, a nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. He is a freelance writer who lives near Vail, Colorado.

10,000 year old high altitude fen slated for drowning by Colorado Springs and Augora, CO

This column was published in the following newspapers:

09/20/2021 Steamboat Pilot Steamboat Springs CO
09/20/2021 Explore Big Sky Big Sky MT
09/20/2021 Salt Lake Tribune Salt Lake City UT
09/20/2021 Colorado Springs North Springs edition Colorado Springs co
09/21/2021 Grand Junction Daily Sentinel Grand Junction CO
09/21/2021 Anchorage Daily Press Anchorage AK
09/22/2021 Durango Herald Durango CO
09/22/2021 Cortez Journal Cortez CO
09/22/2021 Aspen Daily News Aspen CO
09/21/2021 Kingman Daily Miner Kingman AZ
09/21/2021 Denver Post Denver CO
09/22/2021 Montrose Daily Press Montrose CO
09/22/2021 Sky-Hi News Granby CO
09/23/2021 Wyoming Tribune Eagle Cheyenne WY
09/22/2021 Leadville Herald-Democrat Leadville CO
09/21/2021 Glenwood Post Independent Glenwood Springs CO
09/21/2021 Craig Daily Press Craig co
09/22/2021 Moab Times Independent Moab UT
09/26/2021 Boulder Daily Camera Boulder CO
09/26/2021 Rio Blanco Herald Times Meeker CO
09/26/2021 Sterling Journal-Advocate Sterling CO
09/26/2021 Las Vegas Sun Las Vegas NV
09/26/2021 Curry Coastal Pilot Brookings OR
09/26/2021 Fort Morgan Times Fort Morgan CO
10/02/2021 Casper Star Tribune Casper WY
10/03/2021 Colorado Central Magazine Salida CO
10/15/2021 Del Norte Triplicate Crescent City CA
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Opinion: It’s time to stop shipping water across the Rockies — Writers on the Range #EagleRiver #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification | Coyote Gulch
3 years ago

[…] From Writers on the Range (David O. Williams): […]

Retro reservoir plan flies in face of climate-change reality - Real Vail
3 years ago

[…] note: A version of this column, edited for length and clarity, was first published on Writers on the Range and subsequently in newspapers from Denver to Salt Lake City to […]

Colorado reservoir proposal fans flames of climate change, trans-mountain diversion debate - Rocky Mountain Post
2 years ago

[…] note: A version of this column, edited for length and clarity, was first published on Writers on the Range and subsequently in newspapers from Denver to Salt Lake City to […]

2021 Year in Review ... and a respectful funding request for RealVail.com - Real Vail
2 years ago

[…] Vail opinion piece on the project for Writers on the Range – accompanied by photos of the proposed reservoir site by famed nature photographer John […]

Remembering John Fielder and his endless photographic fight to conserve Colorado's wild place - Real Vail
1 year ago

[…] Area to the invaluable Writers on the Range syndicated column network, which prompted me to write a piece for them in exchange for using the Fielder photos with stories on my website and in other publications, […]

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Once a week you’ll receive an email with a link to our weekly column along with profiles of our writers, beside quirky photos submitted from folks like you. Don’t worry we won’t sell our list or bombard you with daily mail.

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x