Town unites to fight a floodplain development

By Mary Moran

Moab, Utah is a growing town of 5,300 that several million people visit each year to tour nearby Arches and Canyonlands national parks, ride mountain bikes or raft the Colorado River.

Like any western resort town, it desperately needs affordable housing. What locals say it doesn’t need is a high-end development on a sandbar projecting into the Colorado River, where groves of cottonwoods, willows and hackberries flourish.

“Delusional,” shameful” or “outrageous” is what many locals call this Kane Creek Preservation and Development project, some sending letters of outrage to the weekly Moab Times-Independent and Moab Sun News. Developers plan 580 luxury housing units and a business park on the floodplain. 

The 180-acre site is less than two miles downstream of Moab along a cracked asphalt road that’s barely two lanes. The development site and the unpredictable river are bounded by looming canyon walls. The road turns to dirt at the downstream end of the site before heading up Kane Creek, a popular mountain biking, hiking and four-wheeling area.

Just upstream of the site, there’s a riverside BLM campground and the mouth of cottonwood-shaded Moonflower Canyon, with its ancient petroglyph panels. 

I first saw this floodplain site in April 1984 when it was underwater. Moab’s former Mosquito Abatement Manager Bob Phillips reports he canoed the site in 1995.

By mid-January of this year, a petition fighting the development, created by Moab resident Laura Long, had 1,200 local signatures. More than 13,000 other signatures came from visitors to Moab or former residents who have their own connections to this land of canyons and slickrock. Access the petition and more information here: https://kanecreekwatch.org/.

A Jan. 16 Grand County Commission meeting about the development packed the chambers, the hallway and Zoom lines. The crowds of largely younger activists made the hearts of us older residents swell.  

Like many resort towns in the west, Moab is rich in beauty, nature and outdoor activities. It’s why locals live and work here, and it’s what we care about preserving. But housing is hard to come by for working people.

Many live in their cars and vans. Local government and nonprofits pursue admirable, but relatively small-scale projects, to build workforce and low-income housing. Unfortunately, this high-end project won’t bring us what we need.

How was this project approved? It’s complicated, but in 1992, the Grand County Commission mistakenly granted rights to build dense commercial and residential buildings on this property, instead of just the campground the former owners wanted. Developers are now exploiting the mistake.

The project has approval to haul in 8 to 10 feet of fill to bury the riparian soils and reach the required one-foot elevation above the designated 100-year floodplain. The County Commission hoped to exercise some control by governing the development’s water and sewer treatment plants, but the state Legislature intervened and allowed developers to run their own district instead.

“Re-grading” is underway and expected to take more than a year. It is major earth-moving, building up the floodplain and the adjacent Kane Creek Road.

Now, drivers and mule deer must watch for haul trucks that move cobbles, gravel and sand onto the floodplain. Migrating and resident birds that nest there may need to make new plans this spring.

Moab resident and Colorado River expert John Weisheit, along with others, have documented evidence of the Colorado River flooding in the past, some floods four times greater than any river volume in living memory.

Future, smaller floods may flood the site with upwelling from rising groundwater. Larger floods will most likely occur as climate change brings more extreme weather events. The entire development could be inundated, causing property loss and a lot of debris flowing downstream and into Canyonlands National Park.

This floodplain should be left alone. Think of the coming of floods small and large, unsolved housing issues, potential sewage-treatment plant failures, lawsuits, road issues, disrupted dark skies, destruction of a wide swath of critical wildlife habitat in the desert, and, of course, heartbreak.

Besides reading like an absurd satire, it sounds like a very poor investment.

Mary Moran is a contributor to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. She lives in Moab where she is a hiker and birder. For 20 years, she worked for Arches and Canyonlands national parks.

Colorado River near Moab, Utah/Courtesy Writers on the Range

This column was published in the following newspapers:

02/05/2024 Salt Lake Tribune Salt Lake City UT
02/06/2024 Denver Post Denver CO
02/06/2024 Vail Daily Vail CO
02/07/2024 Steamboat Pilot Steamboat Springs CO
02/07/2024 Montrose Daily Press Montrose CO
02/07/2024 Jackson Hole News & Guide Jackson Hole WY
02/06/2024 Moab Times Independent Moab UT
02/07/2024 Glenwood Post Independent Glenwood Springs CO
02/07/2024 Aspen Daily News Aspen CO
02/08/2024 Wyoming Tribune Eagle Cheyenne WY
02/08/2024 Durango Herald Durango CO
02/09/2024 Laramie Boomerang Laramie WY
02/08/2024 Kingman Daily Miner Kingman AZ
02/07/2024 Taos News Taos NM
02/11/2024 Cochise County Herald Review Cochise County AZ
02/13/2024 KVNF Radio Paonia CO
02/13/2024 Limon Leader Limon CO
4.7 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James T O'Donnell II
4 months ago

This is just so dumb. I find it amazing that it continues to be legal to build in the flood plain of ANY river anywhere. Floodplains should simply be off-limits to development. It’s that simple. I don’t understand why developers continue to pick fights with mother nature. Water always wins. This development should not be allowed to happen. Further, Many western town governments seem obsessed with the idea of that inviting more rich people in will somehow boost their economy, but building housing for locals won’t? Come on. Protect the floodplain and build affordable high density housing within the town. We got to get smart about stuff.

Fred
4 months ago

What insurance company is backing this foolishness? My insurance rates went up 30% last year and when I asked why they said their costs have gone up across the board. They underwrite stupid projects and then pass their losses on to us.

Crystal muzik
4 months ago

Great article Mary !!!

Fedrizzi
4 months ago

stop destroying the spirit of Moab with all this expansion… I don’t even recognize it anymore…

Susan Denice Hoffman
4 months ago

Please listen to the people that love our valley and want to protect it’s beauty. There really are things more important than monetary profits. Some things cannot ever be replaced.

Jeanette
4 months ago

Thank you for this article.

D. W. Tucker
3 months ago

This makes no sense to grind up a riparian area in the never-ending quest for money. Great places are great because of the landscapes and escape possibilities not because some developer thinks that endless luxury condos are a benefit to society. They are not and never will be. All this development will do is ruin Kane Creek so that a few people with bucks get a part year view of the canyon. Meanwhile, the community can go hang. The county commissioners should be deeply ashamed of themselves, foolishly allowing these developers to exploit a loophole that they themselves created. Moab residents deserve better than this.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Once a week you’ll receive an email with a link to our weekly column along with profiles of our writers, beside quirky photos submitted from folks like you. Don’t worry we won’t sell our list or bombard you with daily mail.

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x