<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump administration legalizes extinction of the Gunnison sage-grouse	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://writersontherange.org/trump-administration-legalizes-extinction-of-the-gunnison-sage-grouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://writersontherange.org/trump-administration-legalizes-extinction-of-the-gunnison-sage-grouse/</link>
	<description>Syndicated Opinion for the American West</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 20:08:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: S Barrett		</title>
		<link>https://writersontherange.org/trump-administration-legalizes-extinction-of-the-gunnison-sage-grouse/#comment-1181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S Barrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://writersontherange.org/?p=11298#comment-1181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Trump&#039;s removal of the regulatory definition of &quot;harm&quot; is the issue affecting the Gunnison&#039;s sage grouse, as well as most other species on the endangered species list.  &lt;span&gt;Previously, regulations defined harm to include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by impairing essential behavioral patterns like breeding, feeding, or sheltering. &lt;/span&gt;With the removal of the definition of harm, there is no longer a requirement for an incidental take permit under the ESA, which required people, agencies, corporations etc. to develop habitat conservation plans that lay out how they would minimize and mitigate effects of projects on species&#039; habitat. &lt;span&gt;Harm&quot; is now undefined in the regulations, but now requires direct, affirmative acts intentionally or immediately directed against a specific animal rather than indirect effects from habitat alteration.  &lt;/span&gt;This is all very separate from a recovery plan, which is not a regulatory document.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump&#8217;s removal of the regulatory definition of &#8220;harm&#8221; is the issue affecting the Gunnison&#8217;s sage grouse, as well as most other species on the endangered species list.  <span>Previously, regulations defined harm to include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by impairing essential behavioral patterns like breeding, feeding, or sheltering. </span>With the removal of the definition of harm, there is no longer a requirement for an incidental take permit under the ESA, which required people, agencies, corporations etc. to develop habitat conservation plans that lay out how they would minimize and mitigate effects of projects on species&#8217; habitat. <span>Harm&#8221; is now undefined in the regulations, but now requires direct, affirmative acts intentionally or immediately directed against a specific animal rather than indirect effects from habitat alteration.  </span>This is all very separate from a recovery plan, which is not a regulatory document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
